Orbital-Scale Climate
Change
|
|
|
Changes in solar heating driven by
changes in Earth’s orbit are the major cause of cyclic climate changes over
time scales of tens to hundreds of thousands of years (23k years, 41k years,
and 100k years) . |
|
Earth’s orbit and its cyclic
variations: tilt variations, eccentricity variations, and precession of the
orbit. |
|
How do orbital variations drive the
strength of tropical monsoons? |
|
How do orbital variations control the
size of northern hemisphere ice sheets? |
|
What controls orbital-scale
fluctuations of atmospheric greenhouse gases? |
|
What is the origin of the 100,000-year
climate cycle of the last 0.9 Myr (ice sheets melt rapidly every 100,000
years)? |
Earth’s Orbit and Its
Variations
|
|
|
First, Earth spins around on its axis
once every day è The Tilt. |
|
Second, Earth revolves around the Sun once a year è The shape
of the Orbit. |
|
Both the tilt and the shape of the
orbit have changed over time and produce three types of orbital variations: |
|
(1) obliquity variations |
|
(2) eccentricity variations |
|
(3) precession of the spin axis. |
|
|
Orbit and Insolation
|
|
|
Variations in the eccentricity of the
orbit cause changes in the annually
averaged amount of sunlight hitting Earth. |
|
Variations in the tilt (obliquity
variations and the precession of the tilt) do not affect the averaged amount
of solar radiation to the Earth. |
|
The tilt variations affect seasons. |
How Does the Tilt Affect
Climate?
|
|
|
At present-day, the axis is tilted at
an angle of 23.5°, referred to as Earth’s “obliquity”, or “tilt”. |
|
The Sun moves back and forth through
the year between 23.5°N and 23.5°S. |
|
Earth’s 23.5° tilt also defines the
66.5° latitude of the Artic and Antarctic circles. No sunlight reaches
latitudes higher than this in winter day. |
|
The tilt produces seasons!! |
Tilt Creates Seasons
|
|
|
Assume the Earth has a perfectly
circular orbit around the Sun. |
|
With no tilt, incoming solar radiation
is always directed straight at the equator throughout the year. |
|
With no tilt, no seasonal changes occur
in solar radiation received at any latitude. |
|
As a result, solstices and equinoxes do
not even exit è NO SEASONS! |
|
|
How Does Orbit’s Shape
Affect Climate
|
|
|
Earth’s orbit is not a perfect circle:
it has a slightly eccentric or elliptical shape. |
|
This noncircular shape is the result of
the gravitational pull on Earth from the Sun, the moon, other planets and
their moons. |
|
The distance to the Sun changes with
Earth’s position in its orbit. |
|
This changing distance has a direct
effect on the amount of solar energy Earth receives. |
Perihelion and Aphelion
|
|
|
The position in which the Earth is
closest to the Sun is called “perihelion”. |
|
Perihelion means “near the Sun” in
Greek. |
|
The position in which the Earth is
farthest to the Sun is called “aphelion”. |
|
Aphelion means “away from the Sun” in
Greek. |
Seasons and the
Elliptical Orbit
|
|
|
Seasons |
|
Solstices: mark the longest and shortest days of the years (June 21
and December 21 in the northern hemisphere, the reverse in the southern) |
|
Equinoxes: the length of night and day become equal in each
hemisphere. |
|
At the present-day orbit, the winter
and summer solstices differ from the aphelion and perihelion by about 13
days. |
Seasonal Temperature
Contrast
|
|
|
The seasonal temperature contrast is
referred to the range of temperature extremes between summer and winter. |
|
The combination of an eccentric orbit
and a tilted spin axis means that the seasonal temperature contrast is
different in the Southern and Northern Hemispheres. |
|
The Southern Hemisphere experiences a
larger seasonal temperature contrast than the Northern Hemisphere. |
Tilt Change (Obliquity
Variation)
|
|
|
Over time, the tilt angle varies in a
narrow range (22.2° ~ 24.5°). |
|
These variations are caused by the
gravitational tug of large planets, such as Jupiter. |
|
The present-day value of the tile is
decreasing. |
|
Cyclic changes in the tilt angle occur
at a period of 41,000 years. |
|
Changes in tilt cause long-term
variations in seasonal solar insolation received on Earth. |
|
The main effect of tilt changes is to
amplify or suppress the seasons: increase tilt amplifies seasonal
differences, decreased tilt reduces them. |
Slide 11
Eccentricity of The
Elliptical Orbit
|
|
|
The degree to which the orbit is
elliptical is called the eccentricity. |
|
The eccentricity is defined as the
ratio of the distance between the center of the ellipse to either focus to
the distance from the center to the edge of the ellipse along the major axis. |
|
The smaller the eccentricity, the more
circular the ellipse is. |
|
|
Eccentricity Variations
|
|
|
Today’s eccentricity is 0.0167, lies
well toward the lower end of the variation range of Earth’s eccentricity
(closer to circular). |
|
The long-term variations in orbital
eccentricity are concentrated at two periods: 100,000 years and 413,000
years. |
|
The eccentricity variations differ from
the other two orbital variations (obliquity variations and the precessional
variations) in one important aspect: Eccentricity variations cause changes in
the annually averaged amount of sunlight hitting Earth. |
Precession of Axis
|
|
|
There are two kinds of precession: (1)
the precession of the spin axis and (2) the precession of the ellipse. |
|
Earth’s wobbling motion is called the
axial precession. It is caused by the
gravitational pull of the Sun and Moon. |
|
Axial precession is a slow turning of
Earth’s axis of rotation through a circular path, with a full turn every
25,700 years. |
Precession of Ellipse
|
|
|
The precession of the ellipse is known
as the elliptical shape of Earth’s orbit rotates itself at a slower rate than
the wobbling motion of the axial precession. |
Time Scales of Precession
|
|
|
The combined effects of these two
precessions cause the solstices and equinoxes to move around Earth’s orbit,
completing one full 360° orbit around the Sun every 23,000 years. |
Eccentricity and Seasonal
Insolation
|
|
|
Small variations in received insolation
do occur in connection with Earth’s eccentric orbit about the Sun, but these
appear only as changes in the total energy received by the entire Earth, not
as seasonal variations. |
|
Compared to the changes in seasonal
insolation of 10% or more that occur at the tilt and precession cycles, these
annual eccentricity changes are smaller by a factor of 50 or more. |
Tilt and Seasonal
Insolation
|
|
|
The hemispheric and seasonal patterns
of insolation changes for tilt and precession are fundamentally different. |
|
Insolation changes at high latitudes
caused by change in the tilt are in phase between the hemisphere from a
seasonal perspective. |
|
For the case of increased tilt, summer
insolation maxima in the northern hemisphere occur at the same time in the
41,000-year cycle as summer insolation maxima in the southern hemisphere. |
Precession and Seasonal
Insolation
|
|
|
For the precessional changes that
dominant low and middle latitudes, the relative sense phasing between seasons
and between hemispheres is exactly reversed from of tilt. |
|
The Earth-Sun distance is the major
control on precessional changes in insolation. |
|
A precessional-cycle insolation maximum
occurring at June 21 (or December 21) will be simultaneous everywhere on the
Earth, a summer season in one hemisphere and a winter season in another
hemisphere. |
Precession and Seasons
Impacts of Precession and
Eccentricity on Insolation
Seasonal Insolation
Changes
|
|
|
The 23,000-year cycle of precissional
change dominants the insolation changes at low and middle latitudes. |
|
The 41,000-year cycle of tilt change
dominants the insolation changes at higher latitudes. |
|
Eccentricity changes (the 1000,000 or
413,000-year cycles) is not a significant influence on seasonal insolation
chanes. |
Insolation Control of Ice
Sheets
|
|
|
What controls the size of Ice Sheets in
the Northern Hemisphere? |
|
è The summer insolation (The Milankovitch Theory). |
Milankovitch Theory
|
|
|
Milankovitch suggested that the
critical factor for Northern Hemisphere continental glaciation was the amount
of summertime insolation at high northern latitudes. |
|
Low summer insolation occurs during
times when Earth’s orbital tilt is small. |
|
Low summer insolation also results from
the fact that the northern hemisphere’s summer solstice occurs when Earth is
farthest from the Sun and when the orbit is highly eccentric. |
Temperature and Ice Mass
Balance
|
|
|
Continental ice sheets exist because
the overall rate at which snow and ice accumulates equals or exceeds the
overall rate of ice loss or ablation. |
|
Temperature is the main factor that
determine whether ice sheets are in a regime of net ablation (negative mass
balance) or net accumulation (positive mass balance). |
|
The boundary between the upper area of
positive mass balance and the lower area of net loss of ice mass is called
the equilibrium line. |
Seasons and the Size of
Ice Sheet
|
|
|
Continental ice sheets exist because
the overall rate at which snow and ice accumulates equals or exceeds the
overall rate of ice loss or ablation. |
|
It is the summer insolation that determines the ice sheets grow and
shrink. |
|
Low (cold) summer insolation is the
critical factor that cools the climate enough to allow snow and ice to
persist from one winter to the next. |
|
Winter insolation is not important to
ice sheet sizes, because (1) the temperatures are always cold in winter and
(2) the Sun at high latitudes are low in the sky, regardless of ongoing
orbital changes. |
Insolation Control of Ice
Sheet Size
|
|
|
The Milankovitch theory proposes that
high summer isolation results in net melting of ice sheets, while low summer
insolation results in net accumulation of ice sheets. |
Three Factors that
Control Ice Sheets
|
|
|
(1) Insolation control of ice sheet
size |
|
(2) Initial lag of ice volume behind
insolation |
|
(3) Subsequent lag of bedrock
depression and rebound behind ice sheet growth and decay |
Insolation Control of Ice
Sheet Size
|
|
|
During high summer insolation, the
equilibrium line is driven north. The continents lie in a regime of net
albation. |
|
During low summer insolation, the
equilibrium line is driven south. The continents lie in a regime of net
accumulation. |
Ice Sheet Lags Behind
Summer Insolation Forcing
|
|
|
Under the most favorable condition (ice
accumulates 0.3 meters each year), a full-size ice sheet 3000 meters thick
would take 10,000 years to form. |
|
At the 41,000-year cycle of orbital
tilt, ice sheets lag behind changes in summer insolation by about 10,000
years. |
|
At the 23,000-year cycle of orbital
precession, ice sheet lags behind summer insolation by about 6,000 years. |
|
The lag times are both about one
quarter of the periods of the cycles. |
Delayed Bedrock Response
Beneath Ice Sheets
|
|
|
As ice sheets grow, the pressure of
their weight on the underlyingion bedrock becomes significant. |
|
Due to the different densities of ice
and rock, a ice sheet of 3000m thickness is roughly equivalent to the weight
of 1000m of solid rock. |
|
The initial sinking would be elastic
and immediate. |
|
The bedrock later respond more slowly
and sinks half of the remaining distance toward the eventual equilibrium
every 3000 years. |
|
The total time to reach the final
depression depth is about 15,000 years. |
Full Cycle of Ice Growth
and Decay
|
|
|
A full cycle of ice sheet growth and
decay incorporates both the delayed response of the ice sheets to summer
insolation forcing as well as the delayed response of bedrock to the ice
sheet load. |
|
As a results of the delays, the maximum
size of ice sheets does not happen at the time of the lowest summer
insolation. |
Factors in Long-Term
Evolution of Ice Sheets
|
|
|
The long-term evolution of ice sheets
reflects the interaction of two factors: changes in summer insolation that
drive shorter-term changes in ice sheet mass balance and a much more gradual
global cooling represented by a slowly changing glaciation threshold. |
|
Ice sheets accumulate when summer
insolation falls below a critical glaciation threshold and melt when it rises
above it. |
Conceptual Phases of Ice
Sheet Evolution
Evidence of Ice Sheet
Evolution
|
|
|
This figures shows a North Atlantic
Ocean sediment core holds a 3 Myr d18O
record of ice volume and deep-water temperature changes. |
|
There were no major ice sheets before
2.75 Myr ago. |
|
After that, small ice sheets grew and
melted at cycles of 41,000 and 23,000 years until 0.9 Myr ago. |
|
After 0.9 Myr ago, large ice sheet grew
and melted at a cycle of 100,000 years. |
Ice Sheet Changes Over
the Last 150,000 Years
|
|
|
A closer look of the last 150,000 years
of the d18O record shows 23,000-year
and 41,000-year cycles. |
Insolation and Ice Volume
Orbital-Scale Changes in
CO2 and CH4
Orbital-Scale Changes in
CO2 and CH4
|
|
|
Methane (CH4) levels have fluctuated
mainly at the 23,000-year orbit rthym of precession. |
|
è These changes may be linked to fluctuations in the strength of
monsoon in Southeast Asia. |
|
During glaciations, atmospheric CO2
values have repeatedly dropped by 30% from the levels typical of warm
interglaciations. |
|
è Most of the explanation for lower glacial CO2 appears to be tied to a
transfer of carbon into the deep ocean. |
|
WHY? |
Trapping Gases in the Ice
|
|
|
Air moves freely through snow and ice
in the upper 15 m of an ice sheet. |
|
Flow is increasingly restricted below
this level. |
|
Bubbles of old air are eventually
sealed off completely in ice 50 to 100 m below the surface. |
Ice Core Drilling
|
|
|
The best place on an ice sheet to take
ice cores is at the top. |
|
Ice cores can be dated by counting
annually deposited layer (or ice flow model). |
|
Annual layering is recorded in several
properties of ice cores, the most obvious of which are layers of dust easily
visible to the eye. |
|
Dust is usually deposited at the end of
cold, dry windy winters. |
|
One of the most famous ice core
drilling is at a site high on the Antarctic ice sheet, which is called the
Vostok ice record. |
|
|
Slide 42
Orbital-Scale Changes in
Methane
|
|
|
The Vostok ice record shows a series of
cyclic variations in methane concentration, ranging between 350 to 700 ppb
(part per billion). |
|
Each Ch4 cycle takes about 23,000
years. |
|
This cycle length points to a likely
connection with changes in orbital procession. |
|
The orbital procession dominates
insolation changes at lower latitudes. |
|
|
Monsoon and Methane
|
|
|
On the 23,000-year cycle, methane
variations closely resemble the variations of monsoon strength. |
|
The peak values of methane match the
expected peaks in monsoon intensity not only in timing but also in amplitude. |
|
This match suggests a close connection
between CH4 concentrations and the monsoon on the 23,000-year climate cycle. |
|
By why? |
Insolation Control of
Monsoons
|
|
|
Monsoon circulations exit on Earth
because the land responds to seasonal changes in solar radiation more quickly
than does the ocean. |
|
Changes in insolation over orbital time
scales have driven major changes in the strength of the summer monsoons. |
|
Changes of 12% in the amount of
insolation received at low latitudes have caused large changes in heating of
tropical landmass and in the strength of summer monsoons at a cycle near
23,000 years in length. |
The Orbital Monsoon
Hypothesis
|
|
|
The 23,000-year cycle of orbital
procession increases (decreases) summer insolation and at the same time
decreases (increases) winter insolation at low and middle latitudes. |
|
Departures from the modern seasonal
cycle of solar radiation have driven stronger monsoon circulation in the
past. |
|
Greater summer radiation intensified
the wet summer monsoon. |
|
Decreased winter insolation intensified
the dry winter monsoon. |
How Did Monsoon Affect
Methane?
|
|
|
Orbital procession affects solar
radiation at low latitudes |
|
è solar radiation affects the strength of low-latitude monsoons |
|
è monsoon fluctuations changes the precipitation amounts in Southeast Asia |
|
è heavy rainfalls increase the amount of standing water in bogs |
|
è decaying vegetation used up any oxygen in the water and creates the
oxygen-free conditions needed to generate methane |
|
è the extent of these boggy area must have expanded during wet monsoon
maxima and shrunk during dry monsoon minima. |
Orbital-Scale Changes in
CO2
|
|
|
The longest orbital-scale record of CO2
changes comes from the Vostok ice core drilling site. |
|
The CO2 record shows a series of
regular oscillation between CO2 values as high as 280-300 ppm and as low as
180-190 ppm over the last 400,000 years. |
|
Values at the high end of this range
occur within the present interglacial interval. |
|
These relative high CO2 values lasted
for several thousand years before the abrupt increase after 1800. |
|
The dominant period of CO2 variations
is about 100,000 years. |
Ice Sheet and CO2
|
|
|
We have learned that the dominant cycle
of ice sheet variations over the last several hundred years has also been
100,000 years. |
|
This suggests that the 100,000-year
variations in atmospheric CO2 match those of ice sheets. |
|
Over the 400,000-year length of the ice
core record, the major cycles of CO2 change line up well with the ice volume
changes (indicated by d18O). |
|
The two signals share not only the
100,000-year cycle but also its asymmetric shape: abrupt increases in CO2
during times of rapid ice melting (i.e., warming) and slower decreases during
times of slower phases of ice volume buildup (cooling). |
|
WHY? |
The Basic Questions
|
|
|
How could CO2 vary by 30% or more over
orbital time scale? |
|
What factors can explain the observed
90-ppm dip in CO2 level during glacial intervals from the levels observed in
interglacial intervals? |
Possibility 1: Physical
Oceanographic Explanation of CO2 Changes
|
|
|
Changes in the physical oceanographic
characteristics of the surface ocean – its temperature and salinity – during
glaciations might alter the chemical solubility of Co2. |
|
Because CO2 dissolves more readily in
colder seawater, atmospheric CO2 will drop by 9 ppm for each 1°C of ocean
cooling. |
|
Because CO2 dissolves more easily in
seawater with a lower salinity, saltier glacial seawater will increase
atmospheric CO2 level. |
|
The effects of seawater temperature and
salinity work against each other! |
|
The net effect of the physical
oceanographic influences on atmospheric CO2 is to decrease CO2 by 11 ppm
during glaciations. |
|
This process only explains 10% of the
CO2 changes on orbital scales. |
Possibility 2: Deep Ocean
Reservoir
|
|
|
The large changes in atmospheric CO2
over intervals of a few thousand years must involve rapid exchanges (compared
to the rate of exchange between the atmosphere and rock) among: the
atmosphere, vegetation and soil, surface and deep ocean. |
|
Not vegetation and soil: because
vegetation reduced during glaciations. |
|
Not surface ocean: because surface
ocean exchanges CO2 quickly (in a few years) with the atmosphere. |
|
The glacial carbon removed from the
atmosphere, from the vegetation, and from the surface ocean must have been
stored in the deep ocean. |
|
Carbon was exported to the deep ocean
by higher rates of photosynthesis and biological productivity. |
Ocean Carbon Pumping
Hypothesis
|
|
|
Carbon was exported from surface oceans
to the deep ocean during glaciations by higher rates of photosynthesis and
biological productivity. |
|
Photosynthesis and organic productivity
occur in the surface ocean because of sunlight and nutrients. |
|
Photosynthesis extracts CO2 from
surface waters and incorporates it in organic tissue (CH2O), some of which
sinks to the deep ocean. |
Where Did the Pumping
Occur?
|
|
|
The pumping hypothesis asserts that
greater downward removal of carbon occurs because more nutrients become
available to stimulate greater removal of organic carbon from surface water
by photosynthesis. |
|
Large-scale changes in biological
pumping of carbon to the deep sea can occu only in relatively productive
regions. |
|
The most productive regions in the
world ocean are in areas of upwelling along costal margins and near the
equator and in the high-latitude surface ocean around Antarctica. |
|
These are the two regions where
significant more organic carbon could have been pumped down into the deep
ocean during glaciations than today. |
|
|
How Glaciations Increased
Productions at Low Latitudes?
|
|
|
Increased Upwelling |
|
Stronger glacial winds |
|
greater wind-driven upwelling of
nutrient-rich water along coast and near equator. |
|
Increased Nutrient Levels By Iron
Fertilization |
|
Stronger glacial winds |
|
Dust rich in iron is blow to the ocean
from arid continental interiors |
|
Ions fertilize the surface ocean and
stimulate greater glacial photosynthesis and productivity. |
|
This fertilization effect stimulates
the productivity in mid-ocean regions far from costal upwelling. |
|
|
|
|
How Glaciations Increased
Productions Near Antarctica?
|
|
|
The deep-ocean circulation in the
Antarctica brings abundant nutrients up into the surface water, which is not
fully utilized by photosynthesis due to the brief summer seasons. |
|
During glacial intervals in the
Antarctic region, increased carbon pumping out of surface water could occur
either because |
|
(1) nutrient-rich waters remained at the surface longer, or |
|
(2) higher glacial nutrient levels stimulated more productivity. |
Changes in Ocean
Chemistry
|
|
|
One of the major factors that
determines CO2 levels in surface water of the world oceans is the amount of
carbonate ion CO3-2. |
|
These ions are produced when corrosive
bottom water dissolve CaCO3 on the seafloor. |
|
When these ions are later returned to
surface waters by ocean circulation, they can combine chemically with CO2 and
produce the bicarbonate ion HCO3-. |
|
Therefore, increasing the amount of CO3-2
ions dissolved by and carried in deep water can have the effect of reducing
CO2 concentrations in surface water. |
Changes in North Atlantic
Deep Water
|
|
|
The carbon isotope trend provides clear
evidence that there was a link between the size of northern hemisphere ice
sheets and the formation of deep water in the North Atlantic nearby. |
|
Less deep water formed in the North
Atlantic every time ice sheets grew larger at the 100,000-year cycle after
0.9 Myr ago. |
|
More deep water formed when ice sheets
were small. |
Changes in Circulation of
Deep Water During Glaciations
|
|
|
The percentage of deep water
originating in the North Atlantic and flowing to the equator during the last
1.25 Myr has been consistently lower during glaciations than during
interglaciations. |
|
In general, southern-source waters
(deep water formed near Antarctica) dominated tropical Atlantic waters during
glaciations. Northern-source water (deep water formed in the North Atlantic)
dominated tropical Atlantic waters during interglaciations. |
Carbon System Controls on
CO2 in the Glacial Atmosphere
|
|
|
Among the changes in the distribution
of ocean carbon that could reduce glacial levels of atmospheric CO2 are: |
|
(1) fast downward organic carbon pumping in areas of costal or
tropical upwelling, |
|
(2) similar processes in Antarctic, |
|
(3) changes in the chemistry of Antarctic surface water toward higher
CO3-2 content, |
|
(4) changes in the chemistry of shallow subsurface water originating
from southern latitudes. |
The Mystery of the
100,000-Year Cycle
|
|
|
After 0.9 Myr ago, the 41,000-year and
23,000-year cycles of ice volume change were overridden by larger and more
dominant fluctuations of ice sheets at a period of 100,000 years. |
|
The large 100,000-year cycle is not
related to any cycle of orbital variations. |
|
TWO QUESTIONS: |
|
(1) Why did more ice accumulate after 0.9 Myr ago? |
|
(2) Why did these large ice sheets melt rapidly every 100,000 years? |
Why Have Ice Sheets Grown
Larger Since 0.9 Myr Ago?
|
|
|
Explanation 1: A result of the gradual
(tectonic-scale) cooling. |
|
Tectonic-scale cooling due to the decrease of CO2 |
|
è cooling reach a threshold value 2.75 Myr ago |
|
è moderate-size ice sheets can form in northern hemisphere ice during major
summer insolation minima and disappeared completely during summer insolation
maxima. |
|
è the falling CO2 levels continued |
|
è cooling reached another threshold value 0.9
Myr ago |
|
è that ice sheets never completely disappeared
during weak summer insolation maxima |
|
è ice sheets began to grow larger and persist
longer |
Slide 63
Why Have Ice Sheets Grown
Larger Since 0.9 Myr Ago?
|
|
|
Explanation 2: Ice Slipping Effect
(nothing to do with climate changes) |
|
During earlier glaciations (2.75 – 0.9 Myr ago), ice sheets may have
been thin because they slid on water saturated soil toward lower elevations
and warmer temperatures. |
|
During later glaciations (beginning from 0.9 Myr ago), after ice
sheets stripped off most of the underlying soil, their central regions could
grow higher because they no longer slid. |
What Causes Abrupt
Deglaciations?
|
|
|
Slow global cooling together with the
less sliding beneath ice sheets helped to create thicker and more extensive
ice sheets beginning 0.9 Myr ago. |
|
What cause the rapid melting every
100,000 years? |
|
Explanation: the 100,000-year
eccentricity cycle |
|
The 100,000-year eccentricity orbital cycle only produces a trivial
amount of direct insolation changes. |
|
It is the modulation of the 100,000-year cycle on the amplitude of the
23,000-year precession cycle that actually affect the rapid melting every
100,000 years. |
Slide 66
Slide 67
Roles of Internal Climate
Interactions
|
|
|
The pace of the 100,000-year variations
in ice sheet size is set by the external forcing from the eccentricity
orbital cycle. |
|
The amplitude of the 100,000-year cycle
depends in part on the internal interactions of the climate system. |
|
The large ice sheets themselves
produced internal interactions within the climate system that hastened their
own destruction every 100,000 years. |
|
The possible positive feedbacks to
accelerate ice sheet melting include: rising CO2 level during deglaciations,
the delayed in bedrock rebound provided warmer temperatures in the depressed
land surface for fast ice melting, and other ice-controlled processes in
wind, sea level, and deep ocean circulation. |